Posts Tagged ‘bishop backbone’

I’m happy to announce I’ll be attending this event in honor of Bishop Robert Vasa here in DC:

“In recognition of his heroic and articulate leadership, Bishop Vasa will be the honoree at our 15th Annual Partnership Dinner on September 16 at the Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel in Washington, D.C. Prior to the reception and dinner, Bishop Vasa will celebrate Mass and speak on the true authority of the bishops. Please email brenda.steele1@gmail.com or romanowsky@insidecatholic.com for more information about this event.”

Deal Hudson devotes his column today to explaining a few of the reasons this brave bishop deserves our honor, and our attention:

“There’s no better antidote to the chatter about “the bishops” than focusing attention on one bishop who, by all accounts, is doing his job exceedingly well. Bishop Robert F. Vasa is a shepherd who has been steadily gaining a national reputation for his articulate leadership on controversial issues and generous support of lay apostolates.” [Read more.]

Last year’s invitee was Archbishop Raymond Burke. Talk about a hard act to follow!

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

One of the more curious legislative priorities of the Democrats these days is the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. With their repeal efforts almost complete (the Senate will take up the final bill sometime in the next couple weeks), Archbishop Timothy Broglio, the head of Catholics in the armed services, has fully entered the fray with an 11th-hour statement, as reported by Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media:

Reacting to passage of pro-gay military legislation in the Congress, the Catholic Archbishop for the Military Services says repeal of the Pentagon’s homosexual exclusion policy would sanction “immoral activity” and “jeopardize morale, good morals, unit cohesion and every other factor that weakens the [military] mission.”

In a late-breaking development that could imperil the ultimate passage of legislation to open the military to open and active homosexuals, Archbishop Timothy Broglio, the chief shepherd of Catholics in the United States Armed Forces, has issued a powerful statement saying that the Bible demands disapproval of homosexuality and that “Under no circumstances can they [homosexual acts] be approved.”

Appointed as Archbishop of the Military Services on November 19, 2007, by Pope Benedict XVI, Broglio is in charge of certifying Roman Catholic chaplains to the United States government.

Refusing to beat around the bush in regard to the Bible’s condemnation of homosexuality, Broglio says in his statement that, “Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that ‘homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.’ They are contrary to the natural law.”

The Archbishop’s statement should also serve as a warning to the elected men and women who have (or are about to) vote this repeal into law, such as the House sponsor of the bill, Rep. Patrick Murphy, who is a Catholic. There are numerous Catholics among those Democrats who are expected to approve the final legislation in the Senate.

Homosexual activists have pursued the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell in order to further their wider and deeper cultural goals of normalizing government sponsorship of homosexual unions and activity. They are so focused on these goals that they have urged Congress to rush into repealing this policy before the military has been given a chance to review what sort of effects this will have on their war-time operations. The repeal is currently included in legislation designed to fund the military, placing representatives who oppose the repeal in the difficult position of having to vote against essential military funding or having to accept an activist social agenda.

It is not hard to imagine that once this policy is repealed, it will be more difficult for Catholic chaplains to preach from the bible about homosexuality and about the Church’s universal call to chastity in their sermons and ministry, and it is more possible to imagine them having to preside over homosexual unions down the road. Such coercion of religious chaplains may seem unthinkable now, but as I’ve written before, the eventual aims of the homosexual agenda are simply in conflict with faithful expressions of religious freedom and biblical teachings.

For now, the battleground is our men and women in uniform, and by speaking out against a repeal of this policy, Abp. Broglio has refused to abandon them and his obligation to preach the truth about the human person and human dignity.

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

Why the Elephant Award?

Because like the legend of the elephant, this bishop doesn’t forget:

Bishop Lawrence Brandt of the Catholic Diocese of Greensburg has declared that religious sisters from communities whose leaders endorsed the final version of the national health care reform bill can no longer promote their recruitment events in his parishes or in the diocesan newspaper.

“He has the right to disapprove a request from a religious community that wants to host a recruitment event when that community has taken a public stance in opposition to the Church’s teaching on human life,” said diocesan spokesman Jerry Zufelt.

“Furthermore an environment of dissent and public opposition to the positions of the U.S. Catholic bishops does not provide an appropriate seedbed for vocations.” (Greensburg Post-Gazette)

As Catholics engaged in politics, we need to develop the virtue of memory and learn from experience. We will make great progress in never being taken in by a lie if we remember what has happened to those who have listened to the same arguments before.

For instance, arguments about voting for a pro-abortion candidate “this time” have little power when we remember what happened to the unborn the last time we voted for a pro-abortion candidate.

Do you have someone who would be a good candidate for the AmP Elephant Award? Drop me a line!

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

Earlier today I briefly mentioned the extraordinary, deceptive measures undertaken by Catholics for Choice to convince young Catholics to use contraception (reported on here by the Marquette Tribune).

I am overjoyed to see that the incoming Archbishop of Milwaukee, Jerome E. Listecki, today set the record straight on the Church’s teaching. Here is the text of the Archbishop-Designate’s statement (bolding is my own):

“It has come to my attention that an organization calling itself �Young Catholics for Choice� has recently entered into collaboration with Family Planning HealthServices of Wausau. Through media advertising, �Young Catholics for Choice� is attempting to convey the message that Catholics can disregard Church teaching regarding contraception, abortion and human sexuality in general and remain Catholics in good standing.

Nothing could be further from the truth. While people can call themselves whatever they want, it is my duty as a bishop to state clearly and unequivocally that by professing and disseminating views in grave contradiction to Catholic teaching, members of organizations like �Young Catholics for Choice� in fact disown their Catholic heritage, tragically distancing themselves from that communion with the Church to which they are called. We pray that they may reconcile their position which is contrary to the Catholic Faith they claim to profess.”

Catholics for Choice” is not the only fake Catholic organization whose mission is to confuse and mislead Catholics, but they are certainly one of the worst (Catholics United and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good are also fake Catholic organizations).

Catholics For Choice, as I also mentioned earlier today, is very active here in Washington DC trying to create support for the flawed health care bill which will be voted on … even arguing for the inclusion of an expanded abortion mandate in the final legislation!

If the same Catholic group that is arguing for the current health care bill is also promoting an agenda that an Archbishop says is “in grave contradiction to Catholic teaching,” we should be extremely pessimistic about their position on other important issues of today. Catholics for Choice is simply more blatant and less nuanced about their opposition to Church church teaching and social teaching than the other organizations I mention above.

Here is a scanned image of the original statement by Abp. Listecki….
Archbishop-Designate Listecki – NEWS RELEASE Re Young Catholics for Choice 12-15-09 http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=24135883&access_key=key-1162jwqs465whaah0fff&page=1&version=1&viewMode=list

Abp. Listecki is taking over the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, which was left vacant when Archbishop Dolan was appointed to New York City. Bishop Listecki previously has served as the bishop of La Crosse, WI, which was previously shepherded by Archbishop Raymond Burke.

I applaud Archbishop-Designate Listecki for vocally proclaiming the truth about what the Church teaches. Catholics for Choice should be ashamed of their deceitful practices, and should publicly apologize.

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

Congressman Kennedy picked the wrong Bishop to mess with.

The back-and-forth between Congressman Patrick Kennedy and Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence, RI has been interesting to watch, especially because Kennedy has attempted to defend himself with every old, tired argument in the liberal playbook.

Bishop Tobin’s most recent round, however, published in the Rhode Island Catholic newspaper, is a grand slam.
Because I’m a spoiler, I’m going to quote the last part of Bishop Tobin’s public letter to Kennedy – but you should take the time and read the whole thing:
“Your rejection of the Church�s teaching on abortion falls into a different category � it�s a deliberate and obstinate act of the will; a conscious decision that you�ve re-affirmed on many occasions. Sorry, you can�t chalk it up to an �imperfect humanity.� Your position is unacceptable to the Church and scandalous to many of our members. It absolutely diminishes your communion with the Church.

Congressman Kennedy, I write these words not to embarrass you or to judge the state of your conscience or soul. That�s ultimately between you and God. But your description of your relationship with the Church is now a matter of public record, and it needs to be challenged. I invite you, as your bishop and brother in Christ, to enter into a sincere process of discernment, conversion and repentance. It�s not too late for you to repair your relationship with the Church, redeem your public image, and emerge as an authentic �profile in courage,� especially by defending the sanctity of human life for all people, including unborn children. And if I can ever be of assistance as you travel the road of faith, I would be honored and happy to do so.”

Next step: official censure or excommunication. Rep. Kennedy has now been publicly rebuked and invited to convert and offer repentance.

Mr. Kennedy, stop while you’re behind. Repent, and be reconciled. You’re out of other options.
Unfortunately, at this point, Mr. Kennedy has broken off his planned meeting with Bishop Tobin. Whatever Kennedy may be thinking, that’s not the right way to set things right.
Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

My friend Josh at Catholic Vote Action gives us an update on the ongoing “dialogue” going on between Congressman the-church-isnt-pro-life Kennedy and Bishop oh-yes-she-is-are-you-stupid Tobin.�

Bishop Tobin recently granted an interview to the Providence Journal:
At another point the bishop addressed what he called the question of whether church leaders are �trying to impose our moral or religious beliefs on Congressman Kennedy.��

His answer: �Well, the fact is he professes to be a Catholic.� Speaking of Catholic legislators generally, Tobin indicated that the church�s view is that, �if someone is clearly and consistently and obstinately opposed to the church on something as serious as abortion � which again is a grave and intrinsic evil � then they really have to question their membership in the church and their participation in the life of the church.�

Josh further tells us:

Kennedy didn�t apologize to Bishop Tobin, but he did backtrack a little. From the Providence Journal:
Kennedy accepted the invitation in a letter last week and said his comments �were never intended to slight the church.� Kennedy acknowledged that �the church has always stood for health-care reform.� He added, �The fact that I disagree with the hierarchy of the church on some issues does not make me any less of a Catholic.�

Kennedy also said that no group �is getting everything it wants� in the medical overhaul. The church �has every right to promote its position,� he said, but if a group �seeks to impose absolutes on the debate, we are left standing idle instead of moving our nation forward.�

That last argument is a canard. Question: What is causing the biggest logjam in moving health care reform bills? It�s Speaker Nancy Pelosi�s insistence on having abortion coverage. If she relented on that, this process could move forward.

I totally agree.

Thanks again, papists, for heading my call to contact Kennedy’s office demanding that he apologize, and for contacting Bishop Tobin and supporting his strong, public response to Kennedy’s slander.

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

This is a sad, but encouraging story. It is certainly important.

It is sad because a young orthodox bishop had to tell an older, heterodox bishop to stay out of his diocese.

It is encouraging because the young orthodox bishop did this for all of the right reasons, in exactly the appropriate way.

Here is the statement of Bishop Sample of Marquette MI on the unwelcome attempted activities of Bishop Thomas Gumbleton, retired auxiliary of Detroit, in his diocese.

I am exerpting only a part of Bishop Sample’s message, so I urge you to read all of it for context (I will bold the important parts):

There is a common courtesy usually observed between bishops whereby when one bishop wishes to enter into another bishop�s diocese to minister or make a public speech or appearance, he informs the local bishop ahead of time and seeks his approval. Only on October 9 did I receive any communication from Bishop Gumbleton, after this situation had already become public.

As the Bishop of the Diocese of Marquette, I am the chief shepherd and teacher of the Catholic faithful of the Upper Peninsula entrusted to my pastoral care. As such I am charged with the grave responsibility to keep clearly before my people the teachings of the Catholic Church on matters of faith and morals. Given Bishop Gumbleton�s very public position on certain important matters of Catholic teaching, specifically with regard to homosexuality and the ordination of women to the priesthood, it was my judgment that his presence in Marquette would not be helpful to me in fulfilling my responsibility.

I realize that these were not the topics upon which Bishop Gumbleton was planning to speak. However, I was concerned about his well-known and public stature and position on these issues and my inability to keep these matters from coming up in discussion. In order that no one becomes confused, everyone under my pastoral care must receive clear teaching on these important doctrines.

I offer my prayers for Bishop Gumbleton and for all those who have been negatively affected by this unfortunate situation.�

And that’s all there is to it. Bishop Sample is the head of his diocese, and when it comes to matters of public scandal – as he judged it would become if he allowed Bishop Gumbleton a pulpit in his diocese – there’s nothing else to be said.

Of course, the organization which invited Gumbleton is saying plenty to the press – let’s take a look:

Members of the Citizens for Peace and Social Justice group said they are appalled, sad and frustrated over a decision by Bishop Alexander Sample of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Marquette to deny a Detroit bishop permission to speak publicly in Marquette this weekend.

“We’re really confused about it,” said Darlene Dreisbach, a member of the Marquette peace organization. “Doesn’t that seem like the Middle Ages?”

“Yesterday afternoon [Bishop Gumbleton] called us and said he received a letter from Bishop Sample to not speak publicly,” Dreisbach said. “He was not told why.” {Given Bishop Sample’s statement above, it seems very clear that he provided Bishop Gumbleton with a very definite reason why.}

“I don’t know how one bishop can deny civil rights,” Dreisbach said, adding that she now has to cancel every event planned for Gumbleton’s visit. {Unfortunately, this individual confuses civil rights with the right of a bishop to prevent confusion being spread about what the Church teaches in his own diocese by a fellow bishop.}

Let’s be clear about the timeline. Sample was evidently aware of Gumbleton’s invitation, and had sent him notice that he was not allowed in the diocese. Gumbleton did not give Sample the curtesy of a response until the same day as the story was in the local news.

You know who else is defending Gumbleton? Gay bloggers, including one who used to work for Pax Christi USA while Gumbleton was heavily associated with it, who writes:

Bishop Sample is a damn fool — running a Catholic gestapo in charge of policing who comes in and out of his diocese lest folks hear a thing or two about equal rights.

Sadly, this isn’t the first time Bishop Gumbleton has been told to keep out from a Catholic diocese. Tucson, Arizona’s Bishop, Gerald Kicanas, also wouldn’t allow Bishop Gumbleton to travel to his diocese to talk about peace and justice issues.

Apparently, censorship is more important to the Catholic Church than championing the cause of peace.

I’m waiting for the editors of the National Catholic Reporter to rush to Bishop Gumbleton’s aid as well. After all, NCR gives a weekly pulpit to Bishop Gumbleton in their newspaper.

Oh that’s right, the NCR editors are too busy suggesting that the bishops should re-write their upcomming pastoral letter on marriage so that they describe “cohabition” in a “more positive light.”

Maybe we can get National Catholic Reporter editions out of the diocese of Marquette too while we are at it?

Ph/T: Jeff Miller.

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

Light in the darkness:

“There was no excuse � none, except intellectual vanity � for the university to persist in its course. And Father Jenkins compounded a bad original decision with evasive and disingenuous explanations to subsequently justify it.

… Father Jenkins’ explanations, and President Obama�s honorary degree, are a fitting national bookend to a quarter century of softening Catholic witness in Catholic higher education. Together, they’ve given the next generation of Catholic leadership all the excuses they need to baptize their personal conveniences and ignore what it really demands to be “Catholic” in the public square.”

Dynamite line:

“We also have the duty to oppose [Obama] when he’s wrong on foundational issues like abortion, embryonic stem cell research and similar matters. And we also have the duty to avoid prostituting our Catholic identity by appeals to phony dialogue that mask an abdication of our moral witness.”

The entire statement is of this quality and clarity.

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

Catherine Harmon at Catholic World Report started this list, and I have continued it:

Bishops� statements on Notre Dame�s invitation to Barack Obama:

  1. Bishop John D�Arcy, Fort Wayne-South Bend
  2. Cardinal Francis George, Chicago
  3. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, Galveston-Houston
  4. Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Milwaukee (–> NYC)
  5. Archbishop John Nienstedt, St. Paul-Minneapolis
  6. Archbishop Eusebius Beltran, Oklahoma City
  7. Bishop Edward Slattery, Tulsa
  8. Archbishop John Myers, Newark
  9. Archbishop Alfred Hughs, New Orleans
  10. Bishop Joseph Martino, Scranton
  11. and Auxiliary Bishop John Dougherty, Scranton
  12. Bishop Thomas Doran, Rockford, Ill.
  13. Bishop Thomas Olmsted, Phoenix
  14. Bishop Gregory Aymond, Austin
  15. Bishop Robert Lynch, St. Petersburg
  16. Bishop R. Walker Nickless, Sioux City
  17. Bishop Kevin Rhoades, Harrisburg, Pa.
  18. Bishop William E. Lori, Bridgeport, CT
  19. Bishop Robert Morlino, Madison WI
  20. Bishop George Murry, S.J., Youngstown, OH
  21. Bishop William Higi, Lafayette, IN
  22. Bishop Anthony Taylor of Little Rock, AR
  23. Archbishop Jose Gomez, San Antonio, TX
  24. and Auxiliary Bishop Oscar Cantu
  25. Bishiop Jerome Listecki, La Crosse, WI
  26. Archbishop Edwin O’Brien, Baltimore MD
  27. Bishop Alex Sample, Marquette MI
  28. Archbishop Daniel Buechlein, Indianapolis
  29. Bishop Robert Baker, Birmingham AL
  30. Bishop Samuel Aquila, Fargo ND
  31. Bishop Gerald Barbarito, Palm Beach FL
  32. Bishop Fabian Brukeswitz, Lincoln NE
  33. Bishop Richard Stika, Knoxville TN
  34. Bishop Robert Finn, Kansas City
  35. Bishop Joseph Latino, Jackson MS
  36. Bishop Leonard Blair, Toledo OH
  37. Bishop Gerald Gettelfinger, Evansville IN
  38. Bishop George Lucas, Springfield IL
  39. Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk, Cincinnati OH
  40. Bishop Thomas Wenski, Orlando FL
  41. Bishop Robert Vasa, Baker OR
  42. Bishop Paul Coakley, Salina KS
  43. Bishop John Le Voir, New Ulm MN
  44. Bishop Victor Galeone, St. Augustine FL
  45. Bishop David Zubik, Pittsburgh PA
  46. Bishop Paul Loverde, Arlington VA
  47. Archbishop Joseph Naumann, Kansas City, KS
  48. Bishop Peter Jugis of Charlotte, NC
  49. Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Center, NY
  50. Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, CO (as first reported by AmP here).
  51. Bishop Glen Provost of Lake Charles LA
  52. Bishop Joseph Galante of Camden, NJ
  53. Cardinal Rigali of Philadelphia, PA
  54. Bishop John McCormack of Manchester, NH
  55. Archbishop Doland Wuerl of Washington, DC (somewhat)
  56. Bishop Bernard Harrington of Winona, MN
  57. Bishop Michael Warfel of Great Falls-Billings, MT
  58. Bishop Michael Jackels of Wichita, KS
  59. Bishop James Johnson of Springfield – Cape Girardeau, MO
  60. Bishop Edward Cullen of Allentown, PA (diocesan newspaper)
  61. (Aux.) Bishop Roger Gries of Cleveland, OH (highschool address)
  62. Bishop Robert Hermann, apostolic administrator of St. Louis, MO
  63. Bishop David Ricken of Green Bay, WI
  64. Bishop Remundo Pena of Brownsville, TX
  65. Bishop George Thomas of Helena, MT
  66. Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston, MA at Boston College Law School
  67. Bishop John Gaydos of Jefferson City (in the Catholic Missourian)
  68. Bishop Lawrence Brandt of Greensburg, PA
  69. Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn, NY
  70. Bishop Joseph of Altoona-Johnstown, PA
  71. Bishop Frank DeWane of Venice, FL
  72. Bishop Frederick Campbell of Columbus, OH
  73. Archbishop Allen Vigneron of Detroit, MI
  74. Archbishop Robert Carlson of St. Louis, MI
  75. Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs, CO (Catholic Herald)
  76. (Auxiliary) Bishop James Conley of Denver, CO (personal letter)
  77. Bishop Donald Trautman of Erie, PA

Feel free to send me the names of arch/bishops I have missed!

Please send tips by email (I don’t always have the time to check the comment box).

Life Site News also has an updating list of bishops (including emeritii).

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS
This morning I attended the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast. You can read my Twitter play-by-play here. And yes that’s me with Archbishop Burke and Justin Aquila of the Susan B. Anthony List.

I was very impressed by Abp. Burke’s keynote address. The audience liked it too – they were constantly interrupting it with applause and standing ovations. In fact at times it was difficult for him to work in a complete sentence.

One comment of Abp. Burke’s in particular, where he called Notre Dame’s decision a “source of the greatest scandal”, was greeted with thunderous and prolonged applause.
But apart from the “radioactive lines” and headline-grabbing soundbites, I think Abp. Burke has provided Catholics in America with a comprehensive manifesto for action in the coming year. I think his speech will have wide, beneficial consequences, or at least I pray that it does.
I will provide a link to the text as soon as it is officially released.
update: EWTN will be broadcasting the entire prayer breakfast at 1 p.m., Sunday, May 10; 5 a.m., Monday, May 11; and 9 a.m., Saturday, May 16.
update 2: Life Site News has the full text on their website.
[photo credit: David Cory.]
Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS

It was news to me that Kmiec even had a regular column at the Catholic News Service.

Jack Smith at the Catholic Key blog says I’m not alone in having missed this embarassing collaboration:

“Many are surprised to find that Doug Kmiec has a regular column for the bishops’ Catholic News Service. He has had one for quite some time and for quite some time it was the best column available at CNS.

Then Kmiec’s original candidate for president, Mitt Romney, failed and the rest of Kmiec and his column’s history has been a spectacle of descent into self-absorption and shameless apologetic for President Obama’s anti-life policies.”

And now he’s got himself into real trouble:

“Apparently [Kmiec] went too far last week with his column titled, and I’m not kidding, “New ethically sensitive stem-cell guidance from the Obama administration”. Cardinal Rigali as head of the USCCB Committee on Pro-Life Activities has responded with his own column this week.”

Cardinal Rigali begins (read the full article HERE):

“Law professor Douglas Kmiec states in an opinion piece distributed by Catholic News Service that the new policy is �ethically sensitive� and in important respects �more strict� than President George W. Bush�s policy that preceded it.

The truth is the opposite.”

Note two things: 1} Cardinal Rigali points out that our own Catholic News Service assisted in disseminating Kmiec’s writing (ouch!). 2} Cardinal Rigali could not be “punchier” in his flat disagreement with Kmiec:

“Kmiec says the new guidelines are limited to embryos created for fertility treatment that �would have been discarded if not devoted to medical research.�

That is also not true.”

Double “punchier” ouch!

Cardinal Rigali actually published his response in CNS as well. LifeSite’s Kathleen Gilbert caught up with him recently and interviewed him about the Notre Dame siutation, which he says “evades common sense”.
Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS
Now that you’ve had a chance to read Bishop D’Arcy’s statement, here are some reasons why it represents an extremely significant development in the Notre Dame situation.
  1. Bishop D’Arcy makes it clear that Fr. Jenkins completely brought this on himself. Jenkins failed to notify D’Arcy of the invitation until after it had been issued (therefore Jenkins never sought approval or advice from his own local bishop), he attempted to engage Bishop Olmsted in canonical debate, involved D’Arcy in this debate by cc’ing him in on the letter (deciding too late to include D’Arcy in the process) and has asked for D’Arcy’s response. At the same time, Jenkins took his arguments to the Notre Dame board of trustees and saw to it that they were published on the national scene, essentially putting D’Arcy in a position to where he had to respond.
  2. D’Arcy has shared his letter with other bishops. While acting on his own authority, he is not alone in his opinions (indeed, 42 bishops have spoken out so far), among bishops or the faithful.
  3. D’Arcy’s language is definitive: “the meaning of the sentence … is clear” “the statements which Father Jenkins has made … are simply wrong.” “I consider [the matter] closed.” “The failure to consult the local bishop … the lawgiver in the diocese, is a serious mistake.” In other words, there is no room for authentic debate on this topic. The only response Fr. Jenkins is being invited to is obedience and reparation.
  4. D’Arcy wastes no time pointing how pathetically poor the defense offered by Fr. Jenkins is in reality. Fr. Jenkins, implies D’Arcy, has completely ignored “fundamental, canonical and theological principal[s]“; has failed to consult with “any competent canonist with knowledge of the tradition and love for Christ�s church”, to say nothing about how Fr. Jenkin’s negligently bypassed the local bishop’s “pastoral responsibility to teach” which is “central to the university�s relationship to the church.” (this last point is a biggie, I think.)
  5. Finally, this line of D’Arcy’s should send a chill up Fr. Jenkin’s spine: “I, like many others, will await to see what the follow up is on this issue between Notre Dame and President Obama.” D’Arcy continues with this straightforward and urgent demand: “Notre Dame and Father Jenkins must do their part if this [substantial and true, and not illusory] healing is to take place.” Fr. Jenkins is being held to his word.

Indeed, I could go on, but I think the picture is becoming clear: the ball is in Fr. Jenkin’s court.

It’s time to fly back to South Bend and face the music.

Share on Facebook | Tweet this | Email Email | RSS