I wasn’t surprised to find out that an article by Timothy Noah in Slate highlighted by the fake Catholyc organization “Catholics United” would end up being riddled with theological, logical and factual errors.
Here’s my brief response to Noah’s “plea to grant health care reform a papal dispensation”.
Noah writes that “It isn’t even true that the Senate bill allows federal funds to be used for abortions.”
That’s not the precise claim made by the pro-life movement. The claim is that huge federal subsidies will go to insurance plans that cover abortions – and so from the consumer side of things, if women want an abortion, they will have access to federal funds through their insurance plan. The non-partisan website PolitiFact.com agrees with this pro-life claim.
Moving on, Noah claims: “could you really get majorities in either the House or the Senate for a bill that would consist entirely of the House abortion restriction, which most Democrats find abhorrent?” For the record, pro-life folks find federal funding of abortions and abortion providers abhorrent. So there.
Furthermore, it is the pro-life side, not the pro-abortion side, which is simply seeking to keep the status quo. Contrary to all the pro-abort claims, women who have abortion coverage now will not lose it. On the other hand, women who are vulnerable now to having an abortion rather than choosing life will have that choice weighted in favor of having an abortion should the current health care legislation pass.
Third point: don’t threaten us. “Are you prepared to see the Catholic Church blamed for denying health insurance to 31 million to 36 million Americans?” Seriously, grow up.
{I’ve deleted my fourth point because, on this count – Noah is correct: Bart Stupak is a Catholic. At one point I read that he wasn’t. I’m happy to hear Noah’s response to my other five points.}
Fourth point: don’t try to offer earthly fame and accolades to make the Church cave-in. Satan tried to do that to Jesus and it didn’t work. Noah won’t have any more success with Pope Benedict when he writes:
“If you like, you can let word leak out in a year or two or five that you played a key role in creating universal health care in the United States. Your predecessor gained considerable luster from his role in ending communism. This secular achievement would be somewhat less spectacular, but on the other hand your centrality to the outcome would be much greater.”
Um, news flash: Pope John Paul II didn’t help take down Communism because it would give him good press and political “luster”. He did it because it was the right thing to do. Just like the current pope won’t support Democrats’ pro-abortion health care plans because … it’s the right thing to do.
Fifth and final (and obvious) point: don’t insult the people you are trying to convince:
“Alternatively, if you didn’t want anyone to know about your role, you could tell the U.S. Bishops to keep their yaps shut. Catholic clerics have always been extremely good—sometimes a little too good—at keeping secrets.”
Noah is here referring to the recent clergy sexual abuse scandal. Classy. At least I can now be 100% comfortable ignoring his sophist logic. Thanks for taking off the mask and showing your disdain for the wounds of the Church. Re-victimizing the Church isn’t a smart way to gain her attention.
Noah concludes by writing “Think it over.”
I did. No thanks.
All best,
Thomas Peters